Mail System Error - Returned Mail

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Mail Administrator (Postmaster@worldnet.att.net)
Date: 05/08/00-04:17:55 PM Z


This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

The user(s) account is temporarily over quota.

<hblair@worldnet.att.net>

Please reply to Postmaster@worldnet.att.net
if you feel this message to be in error.


Received: from bigfoot.com ([208.156.39.206]) by mtiwgwc23.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with SMTP
          id <20000508211754.OJPJ4481.mtiwgwc23.worldnet.att.net@bigfoot.com>
          for <hblair@worldnet.att.net>; Mon, 8 May 2000 21:17:54 +0000
Received: from fastolfe.net ([216.122.85.109])
        by BFLITEMAIL5.bigfoot.com (LiteMail v2.43(BFLITEMAIL5)) with SMTP id 08May2000_BFLITEMAIL5_20038_84787135;
        Mon, 08 May 2000 17:19:53 -0400 EST
Received: by fastolfe.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA16065
        for ihack-58236694; Mon, 8 May 2000 16:08:41 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <200005082105.OAA17066@dilvish.speed.net>
From: Dan <ihack@dilvish.speed.net>
To: ihack@fastolfe.net
Subject: Re: [ihack] iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?
In-Reply-To: Message from kenny@panix.com
   of "Sat, 06 May 2000 18:19:36 EDT." <200005062219.SAA04141@panix5.panix.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 14:05:51 -0700
Sender: owner-ihack@fastolfe.net
Precedence: bulk

kenny@panix.com writes:
>
> The iOpener list S/N ratio has improved dramatically. Can anyone
> see any additional benefit to keeping the ihack list around? It
> seems redundant at this point.
>
> Esp. since a lot of messages get xposted to both lists, I'd think "no", but
> don't kill it as much as I'd just "not recommend" it anymore.

Yeah, crossposts are the vast majority of the traffic on ihack. Getting
duplicate copies of all those messages is really annoying, but as long as
there's the possibility of useful info appearing only on ihack and not on
iopener, I'll remain subscribed to both lists. Therefore, yeah, I say kill
ihack -- it was a good idea but seems unnecessary now (and presumably in the
future).

I guess one other option would be to automatically refuse all messages with
[iopener] in the subject. The crossposts are stupid -- people who want info
from both lists should subscribe to both.

--
Dan <ihack@dilvish.speed.net>
--
To unsubscribe:
  E-mail majordomo@fastolfe.net with the text "unsubscribe ihack".
Useful sites:
  http://iopener.home.fastolfe.net/ihack/ (List Archive)
  http://fastolfe.net/misc/ihack-resources.html (IHack Resources)


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.