Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?

From: kenny@panix.com
Date: 05/06/00-05:19:36 PM Z

• Next message: I Opened It: "[iopener] Win98 question?"
• Previous message: Larry Jackson: "SERIAL PORT OUTPUT AT BOOTUP!"
• Next in thread: Dan: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: Dan: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"

  The iOpener list S/N ratio has improved dramatically. Can anyone
  see any additional benefit to keeping the ihack list around? It
  seems redundant at this point.

Esp. since a lot of messages get xposted to both lists, I'd think "no", but
don't kill it as much as I'd just "not recommend" it anymore.

        -Kenny

--
To unsubscribe:
  E-mail majordomo@fastolfe.net with the text "unsubscribe ihack".
Useful sites:
  http://iopener.home.fastolfe.net/ihack/ (List Archive)
  http://fastolfe.net/misc/ihack-resources.html (IHack Resources)

• Next message: I Opened It: "[iopener] Win98 question?"
• Previous message: Larry Jackson: "SERIAL PORT OUTPUT AT BOOTUP!"
• Next in thread: Dan: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: Dan: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"