iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?

From: David Nesting (david@fastolfe.net)
Date: 05/06/00-12:00:00 PM Z

• Next message: chris@ncafe.com: "XF86Config"
• Previous message: Michael Riches: "Re: [iopener] Laptop memory"
• Next in thread: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"

The iOpener list S/N ratio has improved dramatically. Can anyone
see any additional benefit to keeping the ihack list around? It
seems redundant at this point.

David

-- 
 == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe david@fastolfe.net http://fastolfe.net/ ==
--
 Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me
 spread!
--
To unsubscribe:
  E-mail majordomo@fastolfe.net with the text "unsubscribe ihack".
Useful sites:
  http://iopener.home.fastolfe.net/ihack/ (List Archive)
  http://fastolfe.net/misc/ihack-resources.html (IHack Resources)

• Next message: chris@ncafe.com: "XF86Config"
• Previous message: Michael Riches: "Re: [iopener] Laptop memory"
• Next in thread: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"
• Reply: David Lesher: "Re: iopener s/n better -- keep ihack?"